您的位置:站长主页 -> 繁星客栈 -> 观星楼 (自然科学论坛) -> Higgs boson mass and detection | November 22, 2024 |
Higgs boson mass and detection
用户登陆 | 刷新 | 本版嘉宾: sage yinhow |
sage 发表文章数: 1125 |
Higgs boson mass and detection 1) Discoving massive W and Z particle does not imply the existence of Higgs. It shows 1a) there is a electroweak phase transition in which electroweak symmetry is broken. Otherwise, W and Z would be massless. 1b) there are additional degrees of freedoms, Goldstones, being eaten by the gauge boson, because massive gauge boson have 1 more degree of freedom than the massless one. However, none of this leads to the conclusion of the existence of a Higgs. The Higgs boson as a new degree of freedom only exist if there are additional bosonic states in the electroweak symmetry breaking sector. 1c) The standard model with 1 Higgs doublet is an example where there is one additional degree of freedom we call Higgs boson. 1d) On the other hand, there are models of electroweak symmetry breaking where we do not have a Higgs boson at all. Technicolor is one of such models. 2) Now let's move on with the assumption that there is a Higgs boson. IF there is such a state, how do we know it is there. Of course, it is a state in the theory. Therefore, it will come in through in the loop corrections to parameters in the theory, such as masses and couplings. Therefore, even we do not see it fly in front of our eyes, we should tell its existence by just looking at its contribution to the radiative corrections of various Standard Model parameters. This is certainly true and has been pursued for quite a while already. It has the name electroweak precision tests. From that, assuming Standard Model with one Higgs boson, we already know that Higgs boson should be lighter than 200 GeV. However, these are INDIRECT evidences of Higgs boson and its properties. How do we know a Higgs boson really exists? How do we know the effect we see in the electroweak precision tests are not from some other stuff? 3) There is only one way to be sure. We have to produce the Higgs and measure it properties. By 'produce', we mean that we have to have enough energy to produce a Higgs on-shell and measure its decay products. Notice that just like W and Z bosons, Higgs is not stable. It will decay to other particles right away. Therefore, existence of Higgs means the existence of such a state in the Hilbert space of the theory. it does mean, however, we can just go and collect them in nature. We have to have enough energy to excite such an heavy state. 4) Now I am going to talk about the details of producing and detecting Higgs. However, for the impatients, here is the summary. Because it mass and (mainly) its couplings, producing and detecting a Higgs is much much harder than W and Z. The best limit we have now on the Higgs mass is about 115 GeV from LEP. (see details below point 5 ) 5) Now, when do we give up searching for a Higgs? With all the difficulties above, LHC could still probe Higgs mass all the way up to about 1 TeV = 1000 GeV. Upto that point, if we still do not see the Higgs, I will at least give up the simple model with 1 Higgs boson, because we do not expect Higgs mass to be very different from W and Z, certainly not more than one order of magnitude. On the other hand, there we have puzzle of how the electroweak symmetry is borken. We will have to build more powerful colliders to find out. In general, the mechanism resposible for electroweak symmetry breaking should not be very far away from the weak scale, and we should be able to find out in the next couple generations of colliders. It is very important to realize that in a collider, any new particle do not come out with a little flag on it saying that 'hey, my name is ....'. Most of the particles, like Higgs or W/Z, decay before it reach any detector. Therefore, we only see their decay products. A usual practice is to detect the decay products, from them, we infer the production of a 'mother' particle. In order to see a particle, we have to have enough energy to produce it. What is enough depends not only on the particle mass, but also on the production processes. For W and Z, since they couple directly to standard model fermions with gauge couplings, we can directly producing them by colliding Standard model fermions together. For example, we can directly produce a Z boson by annhilation of an electron and a positron with enough energy: e^(-) + e^(+) ---> Z Therefore, order to produce Z, the energy we need for a electron-positron collider is E>m_Z. Similarly, in order to produce a W, we could have a proton-antiproton collider with the process u + dbar ---> W^(+) with energy E>m_W. I remind you that m_W is about 80 GeV and m_Z is about 90 GeV. (by the way, these processes are usually called Drell-Yan processes) On the other hand, how do we produce a Higgs? In principle, Higgs will couple to Standard Model fermions with Yukawa couplings. However, in the Standard Model, because higgs Yukawa couplings are also responsible for generating the fermion masses, the size of yukawa couplings are proportional to the fermion mass. This makes them typically very small. For example, higgs-electron-electron Yukawa coulping is about m_e/v which is about 10^(-2) to 10^(-3). Therefore, it is very hard to produce Higgs through annihilation of fermions. There are many other processes which produces higgs. Let me just mention one which is more relevant for lepton colliders and low energy Hadron colliders. IT is the process f + fbar ---> W(Z)* ---> W(Z) + h the * means that the W, Z intermediate state is virtual. One immediately see that this is very different from W/Z production. The Energy required for this process is m_W(or m_Z)+m_h !! this meaning producing a Higgs is much much harder than producing W and Z. LEP, an electron-positron collider, has center of mass energy of about 200 GeV. Therefore, it has an limit on Higgs mass as 115 GeV (It is the highest mass they can probe!). It is also very important to realize that we have no control to select one kind of particle to produce. We product all of them according to certain probabilities. Therefore, in order to single out a channel, we have to go above the background, ie, other particle productions. This is particularly relevant for LHC which is a proton-proton collider which produces a lot of junks. Now, for W and Z, they can decay to quarks as well as leptons. leptons are in general much easier to be observed than quarks. Higgs particle, on the other hand, couples to fermion through Yukawa couplings, which proportional to the fermion mass. Therefore, it will usually prefer to go to heavier fermions. therefore, electron and muons are not among the common decay products of the Higgs. A Higgs with mass about 115 GeV will typically go to a pair of bottom quarks. This is in general harder to see than leptons. (detecting a Higgs signal is a very big subject of active research. I only covered the very surface of it here. I could go into details if anyone is interested in it.)
|
||
元江 发表文章数: 228 |
Re: Higgs boson mass and detection Thanks, sage, this is a nice introduction about how the Higgs particle is going to be searched. I am pretty naive about the experiment of high energy physics (even others too). I will read it more carefully. If I were a congressman, I would agree to give money for high energy collider now:-) 道可道非常道 名可名非常名
|
||
可见光 发表文章数: 421 |
Re: Higgs boson mass and detection 谢谢sage哥(还有昌海哥),让我们方便快捷地了解知识。 detecting a Higgs signal is a very big subject of active research. I only covered the very surface of it here. I could go into details if anyone is interested in it. 在LHC即将横空出世之际,愿闻其详。另外,Higgs机制之外的替代方案好象也有不少,不妨顺便也介绍一些,令我们更有一个立体感。 生活充满七彩阳光,是为可见光 宇宙无限,爱心永恒!
|
||
georgecsh |