No-go
发表文章数: 369
武功等级: 太极剑法
(第一重)
内力值: 242/242
How Einstein may have got wrong
How Einstein may have got the theory of relativity wrong
THE GUARDIAN ^ | 4/12/05
Tuesday, Apr 12, 2005
A century after Albert Einstein published his most famous ideas, physicists commemorated the occasion by trying to demolish one of them.
Yesterday astronomers were to tell experts gathering at Warwick University in England to celebrate the anniversary of the great man's "miracle year" that the speed of light -- Einstein's unchanging yardstick that underpins his special theory of relativity -- might be slowing down.
Michael Murphy, of the Institute of Astronomy at Cambridge University, said: "We are claiming something extraordinary here.
fundamental
"The findings suggest that there is a more fundamental theory of the way that light and matter interact; and that special relativity, at its foundation, is actually wrong," Murphy said.
Einstein's insistence that the speed of light was always the same set up many of his big ideas and established the bedrock of modern physics.
Murphy said: "It could turn out that special relativity is a very good approximation but it's missing a little bit."
"That little bit may be the doorknob to a whole new universe and a whole new set of fundamental laws," Murphy added.
Murphy's team did not measure a change in the speed of light directly.
light from quasars
Instead, they analyzed flickering light from the far-distant celestial objects called quasars.
Their light takes billions of years to travel to Earth, letting astronomers see the fundamental laws of the universe at work during its earliest days.
The observations, from the Keck telescope in Hawaii, suggest that the way certain wavelengths of light are absorbed has changed.
electromagnetic force
If true, it means that something called the fine structure constant -- a measure of the strength of electromagnetic force that holds atoms together -- has changed by about 0.001 percent since the Big Bang.
The speed of light depends on the fine structure constant.
If one varies with time then the other probably does too, meaning Einstein got it wrong.
If light moved faster in the early universe than now, physicists would have to rethink many fundamental theories.
His conclusions are based on work carried out in 2001 with John Webb at the University of New South Wales in Sydney.
disputed
Other astronomers disputed the findings, and a smaller study using a different telescope last year suggested no change.
Murphy's team is analyzing the results from the largest experiment so far, using light from 143 bright stellar objects.
Einstein's burst of creativity in 1905 stunned his contemporaries. He published three papers that changed the way scientists viewed the world, including the special theory of relativity that led to his deduction E=mc2.
The Physics2005 conference, set up by the Institute of Physics as part of its Einstein Year initiative, runs until Thursday.
| 发表时间：2005-04-15, 19:31:36 |
 作者资料
|
kanex
发表文章数: 860
武功等级: 弹指神通
(第六重)
内力值: 343/343
Re: How Einstein may have got wrong
The speed of light depends on the fine structure constant.
==========================
不一定
江畔何人初见月`江月何年初照人`
| 发表时间：2005-04-16, 02:20:43 |
作者资料
|
No-go
发表文章数: 369
武功等级: 太极剑法
(第一重)
内力值: 242/242
Re: How Einstein may have got wrong
You mean Plank constant might be variable or more worsely charge of electron is not constant with time?
| 发表时间：2005-04-16, 11:34:44 |
作者资料
|
kanex
发表文章数: 860
武功等级: 弹指神通
(第六重)
内力值: 343/343
Re: How Einstein may have got wrong
You mean Plank constant might be variable or more worsely charge of electron is not constant with time?
===========================
How about a new constant?
If some of our constants change as time flows, there must be some rules, thus some constants, that determine all these strange behaviour.
A discover of new constant reveals new physics, and vice versa. Just as the case in c <-> relativity, hbar <-> quantum.
However, I still highly doubt the result of this experiment. Or I will be a 民科, haha.
江畔何人初见月`江月何年初照人`
| 发表时间：2005-04-16, 15:08:09 |
作者资料
|
sage
发表文章数: 1125
武功等级: 天山六阳掌
(第六重)
内力值: 535/535
Re: How Einstein may have got wrong
This is a typical journalist's distortion of the true story.
It is some reports several years ago that fine-structure constants might be varying. It is not conclusive at all yet.
| 发表时间：2005-04-16, 15:30:31 |
作者资料
|
kanex
发表文章数: 860
武功等级: 弹指神通
(第六重)
内力值: 343/343
Re: How Einstein may have got wrong
Nowadays there are too many hoax in newspapers.
江畔何人初见月`江月何年初照人`
| 发表时间：2005-04-17, 05:11:44 |
作者资料
|